While one should mention that those involved with this site are probably really great people. Britannica and Britney are considered to be only of the best sort of people.
They seemed to have been subjected to much harm and false notions about this site.
That is because who ever else was involved have just used that involvement to cause much senseless trouble for them and everyone using this site.

Here you have comments such as this on a public networking site. While there is claims to be concerned about social networking. What who ever was involved appears to have been doing was blocking sites for unknown reasons. They never explained why they did that. And, given the public content they allowed on this site, there was never anything that was as offensive as this. If the law or if there were any rules to such sites, than one should expect that.

The thing is, people do have a right to privacy. That means that people's access shouldn't have been blocked. If there was something illegal that was different. Blocking people's private sites for no reason is illegally. So is making false accusations of innocent people. And so is interfering with people's legitimate private business. Everyone gets spam. And, if that was what was happening, that is hardly a reason for blocking someones site.

The whole situation here is one where if a adult is legally the same as a child, than why isn't that mentioned. And, if who ever was involved in the operation of this site was at all concerned about children, than consent laws should be placed on this site. When people are confronted with the legal consequences of their actions, than they would be much less likely to be involved in such comments or conduct. Such as laws where some places, assault without legal consent maybe a capital offense.

People who aren't legally competent should never be involved in situations involving such relationships. That is why the whole notion of blocking sites while allowing public content such as this seems seriously wrong. You are encouraging relationships that are illegal and wrong. While interfering with legitimate communications. While never even trying to find what a situation really is. You know, one may have only good feeling about Britney and Britannica, these situations don't seem like they are helping them or anyone else.

I know as someone who is really concerned about them, these are just exactly the sort of situations anyone responsible should be suggesting they stay away from. Sure, you don't know who is and who isn't legitimate. And, what ever sort of law enforcement has been involved in this site has only caused harm to everyone. That is what happens when ever there were those involved who really were never qualified. Most of what ever harm is from the words and public content that nothing was being done about. While, anyone who was legitimate was subjected to all sorts of wrong and criminal abuse of those who weren't the competent law they were claiming.

We know, that Britannica isn't a lawyer, Nor should a lawyer be required for knowing the differences between what is legitimate and what isn't. Talking about Britney that was is legally the same as talking about a child. Doesn't that concern Britannica? Or anyone else who really cares about her or Britney. Being involved in any sort of illicit conduct isn't going to help Britney get child custody or improve her situation with her own children or family. And, these sort of situations aren't going to help anyone else legitimate.

I would suggest finding out who was behind the content of this site. That is, who was condoning all the wrong conduct while engaging in the sorts of abuses that were wrong. This is a public site that should have stated policies of what content is accepted if there is going to be any site blocking. And, who ever was involved in the sorts of negative public content meant to try to harm legitimate people, while the law involved in such crimes should be subject to the consequences. And, that is the ones who actually deliberately caused the harm, rather than the innocent Britannica and Britney.